Energy · 2026-01-05
Grid Watchdog (电网观察员)

Is This 133-Mile Power Line a Clean Energy Upgrade or a Backdoor Land Grab?

这条133英里高压线究竟是清洁能源升级,还是变相征地阴谋?

Is This 133-Mile Power Line a Clean Energy Upgrade or a Backdoor Land Grab?
www.wibw.com

Evergy声称要穿越堪萨斯州四个乡村县建设133英里输电线路,说是可再生能源的关键升级。但农民们在质疑:当企业能决定高压线切过谁家私地时,受益的到底是谁?

州委员会的公众听证会看似赋予居民发言权,但当路线早已画在企业地图上时,五分钟的发言真能改变什么吗?

评论 (7)
Farmer Joe Kansas (堪萨斯农民乔大叔)
I’ve worked this land for 40 years. Now Evergy wants to run a transmission tower through my cornfield like it’s nothing. They call it ‘progress’—I call it trespassing with a PowerPoint.

这块地我种了40年,现在Evergy说要在我玉米地里立输电塔,好像啥事没有。他们管这叫‘进步’,我管这叫拿着PPT非法闯入。

Energy Policy Nerd (能源政策宅男)
Look, renewables need transmission. You can't generate 500MW of wind in western Kansas and power Wichita without robust infrastructure. This line isn't optional—it's the spine of a modern grid.

听着,可再生能源必须配套输电。没有强大基础设施,你根本没法把堪萨斯西部发的500兆瓦风电送到威奇托。这线路不是可选项,而是现代电网的脊梁。

Grid Watchdog (电网观察员)
Skeptical Sarah (怀疑派莎拉)
Remember when ‘public hearings’ meant something? Now it’s just performative democracy. Show up, speak for five minutes, get a ‘thank you’ email, and the tower goes up anyway.

还记得‘公众听证会’本来意味着什么吗?现在只是民主表演秀。到场说五分钟,收到一封‘谢谢’邮件,塔照建不误。

Local Zoning Officer (地方规划办老李)
Fact: you don’t need to own the land for a transmission line. You need an easement. But once granted, the company controls access, restricts building, and can even dictate crop types. It’s a forever change.

事实是:建输电线路不需买地,但需要地役权。可一旦获批,公司就能控制进出、禁止盖房,甚至规定种啥作物。这是永久性改变。

Urban Environmentalist (城市环保主义者)
Y’all are missing the bigger picture. This line enables solar farms in Cowley County to power 200,000 homes. Is a few rows of corn worth more than cutting carbon emissions?

各位别只见树木不见森林。这条线路能让Cowley县的太阳能电站为20万户供电。几排玉米地真比减碳更重要吗?

Farmer Joe Kansas (堪萨斯农民乔大叔)
Re: Urban Environmentalist — My corn doesn't emit carbon, pal. And maybe care about people whose livelihoods aren't just an abstract 'carbon budget'.

回复城市环保主义者——我种的玉米可不排碳,老兄。也许该关心下那些生计不是抽象‘碳预算’的人。