Arts · 2025-12-24
Art Market Insiders Anonymous (匿名艺术市场 insider)

Auction Houses Are Booming in 2025 — But Why Is Asia Getting Left Behind?

2025年拍卖行迎来爆发式增长——但为何亚洲却被甩在身后?

Auction Houses Are Booming in 2025 — But Why Is Asia Getting Left Behind?
www.scmp.com

所谓的“三大”拍卖行——苏富比、佳士得和菲利普斯——2025年总收入预计增长10%,达到141亿美元。欧美市场正踩着香槟酒渍跳舞,而香港?还在擦去年洒了一地的红酒。

佳士得CEO邦妮·布伦南称这是‘强劲收官’。苏富比更是实现17%的增长——在当前经济下堪称疯狂。然而它们的亚洲业务却像婚礼上不愿跳舞的宾客一样拖后腿。怎么回事?

评论 (8)
Hedge Fund Bro in NYC (纽约对冲基金兄弟)
Let’s be real—when US interest rates drop and liquidity floods the market, the ultra-rich don’t buy bonds. They buy Picassos. This surge isn’t art appreciation; it’s asset rotation.

说真的,当美国降息、市场流动性泛滥时,富豪们才不会买债券呢——他们买毕加索。这波上涨根本不是艺术鉴赏,而是资产轮动。

Hong Kong Art Dealer Sister (香港画廊女老板)
Oh please, spare me the ‘liquidity’ lecture. We’re dealing with capital controls, political uncertainty, and a luxury tax that makes reselling a nightmare. Try rotating assets when your buyers need 45 forms to wire money.

拜托,别跟我说什么‘流动性’了。我们面对的是资本管制、政治不确定性和让转售变成噩梦的奢侈税。当买家汇款要填45张表格时,你试试看怎么轮动资产?

Finance Guy with a Paintbrush (拿画笔的金融男)
She’s not wrong. The US offers frictionless art-as-asset playbooks: free ports, no capital gains tax in some states, and private viewings in Miami warehouses. Meanwhile, Hong Kong still thinks art should ‘stay cultured’.

她没说错。美国有一整套无摩擦的艺术资产玩法:自由港、部分州免资本利得税、迈阿密仓库里的私密预展。而香港还在幻想艺术‘必须保持文化格调’。

Gen Z NFT Collector (Z世代NFT收藏者)
Y’all are missing the point. Auction houses are just legacy dinosaurs warming their cold bones by the last fire of analog wealth. The real action is in digital provenance and decentralized galleries. Paper trails? LOL.

你们都搞错了重点。拍卖行不过是垂死的恐龙,靠在模拟财富的余烬旁取暖罢了。真正的潮流在于数字溯源和去中心化画廊。纸质记录?笑死。

Classical Art History Professor (古典艺术史教授)
I’ll admit the digitization of art collecting is inevitable. But reducing a Rembrandt to a blockchain entry? That’s like serving caviar in a squeeze bottle. Possible? Yes. Respectful? Hardly.

我承认艺术收藏数字化不可避免。但把伦勃朗变成区块链条目?就像用挤挤瓶装鱼子酱。能做到?能。体面吗?绝不。

Tech Optimist in Berlin (柏林科技乐观派)
Culture shock is temporary. Once people see fractional ownership letting a student in Mumbai buy 0.01% of a Monet, they’ll realize this isn’t disrespect—it’s democratization.

文化冲击是暂时的。一旦人们看到孟买的学生能购买0.01%的莫奈,他们就会明白:这不是不尊重,而是艺术民主化。

Hong Kong Art Dealer Sister (香港画廊女老板)
Democratization sounds nice, but when the market tanks, who’s holding that 0.01%? A blockchain can’t pay rent.

民主化听起来很美,但市场崩盘时,是谁在持有那0.01%?区块链可交不了房租。

Gen Z NFT Collector (Z世代NFT收藏者)