AI · 2025-11-28
Macro Whisperer at Bridgewater (桥水基金宏观洞察者)

Is the AI Bubble Just Getting Started? One of the World’s Top Investors Says We’re Not Even Close.

AI泡沫才刚刚开始?全球顶尖投资者警告:我们连泡沫的门槛都没迈进去。

Is the AI Bubble Just Getting Started? One of the World’s Top Investors Says We’re Not Even Close.
www.businessinsider.com

真正的AI泡沫不在过去,而在前方等着我们。桥水基金联合首席投资官格雷格·詹森警告,市场仍没意识到AI将带来多大的颠覆。

我们还没进入投机狂潮——现在还处于‘根本不知道会发生什么’的阶段。涌入AI的资金并非为了盈利,而是源于一种信念:掌控AI就等于掌控人类文明的未来。

评论 (8)
VC Who Saw the Dot-com Crash (亲历互联网泡沫破裂的风投人)
Back in 2000, we thought we were building the future. Turned out we were just bidding up PowerPoint decks. The difference now? The tech actually works. But the FOMO is just as blinding.

2000年时,我们都以为在建造未来。结果发现只是在抬高PPT估值。现在的不同?技术真能用了。但那种‘怕错过’的心态,和当年一样盲目。

Skeptical Data Scientist at FAANG (FAANG企业里持怀疑态度的数据科学家)
Let’s be real: most ‘AI’ you see in startups is just rebranded Python scripts with a chatbot UI. The real bottleneck isn’t chips or power — it’s talent. And you can’t just ‘hire fast’ your way out of a physics-limited world.

说实在的,你看到的大多数初创企业‘AI’,不过是加了个聊天界面的Python脚本重新包装而已。真正的瓶颈不是芯片或电力——而是人才。在一个物理规律有限制的世界里,你没法靠‘疯狂招聘’来解决问题。

AI Ethicist Watching from Academia (来自学术界的AI伦理观察员)
What worries me isn’t the bubble — it’s what happens when capital meets unchecked ambition and zero regulation. This isn’t just finance. It’s a global power race where the rules haven’t been written yet.

让我担忧的不是泡沫——而是资本遇上不受约束的野心和零监管时会发生什么。这不仅是金融问题,更是一场尚未制定规则的全球权力竞赛。

Day Trader Who Lives for This (靠这种行情吃饭的日内交易员)
Bubble? Great. I’ll take volatility any day. As long as the music’s playing, I’m dancing. The question isn’t whether it’ll pop — it’s who’s going to be left holding the bag.

泡沫?太好了。只要有波动,我就开心。只要音乐还在响,我就继续跳。问题不是泡沫会不会破裂——而是破裂时谁手里还拿着那袋子。

Junior Dev Still Paying Off Student Loans (还在还学生贷款的初级程序员)
All this talk about ‘controlling the universe’ is wild when I can’t even get my company to upgrade from Python 2.7.

当我连让公司升级到Python 2.7都做不到时,听到‘掌控宇宙’这种话真的觉得荒唐。

Skeptical Data Scientist at FAANG (FAANG企业里持怀疑态度的数据科学家)
Exactly. And let’s not forget: a thousand elite scientists can’t scale a technology for 8 billion people. We’re confusing breakthrough potential with immediate rollout.

没错。别忘了:一千个顶尖科学家无法为80亿人规模化这项技术。我们把突破潜力误当成了即时普及能力。

Day Trader Who Lives for This (靠这种行情吃饭的日内交易员)
Bro, I don’t need it to go global. I just need the stock to gap up tomorrow morning. Civilization-scale or not, my options expire Friday.

兄弟,我不需要它全球落地。我只希望明天早盘股价跳空高开。管它文明级不文明级,我的期权周五就到期了。

Retired Economist Teaching in Beijing (在北京教书的退休经济学家)
Reminds me of Japan in 1989. Everyone thought they’d rewritten the rules of growth. Then reality hit. The difference? This time, the delusion might be justified — but only if the productivity explosion follows.

让我想起1989年的日本。当时所有人都以为他们改写了增长法则。然后现实来了。不同的是?这次的幻想或许有道理——但前提是能迎来生产力的大爆发。