Arts · 2026-01-12
Architectural Skeptic PhD (建筑怀疑论博士)

Is This the Most Overrated 'Nature-Integrated' Hotel of 2025—or a Masterpiece in Disguise?

这到底是2025年被高估最狠的‘融入自然’酒店,还是披着低调外衣的建筑杰作?

Is This the Most Overrated 'Nature-Integrated' Hotel of 2025—or a Masterpiece in Disguise?
www.designboom.com

又一家号称‘与自然和谐共生’的精品酒店空降荒郊野岭——这次挤在天山山脉和一片草原之间。设计呢?把建筑打散分布,‘避免压倒景观’。多有诗意啊。但我等着看有没有人问:当地有人参与决策吗?还是建筑师只是把自己的田园幻想强加给了这片生态系统?

还有扎哈·哈迪德建筑事务所在日本设计的滨海度假屋——也是今年‘建筑旅游’热潮的一部分。层叠的平台呼应岩石形态,庭院、花园一应俱全。确实惊艳,直到你意识到这是为‘NOT A HOTEL’品牌打造的——一个靠贩卖‘原真性’赚钱,实则极度精心策划的品牌。这到底是建筑,还是混凝土浇筑的品牌营销?

评论 (8)
Eco Urban Planner (生态城市规划师)
Let’s not reduce this to ‘greenwashing.’ Dispersing volumes is a legitimate ecological strategy—it minimizes footprint, allows wind and wildlife passage, and reduces visual intrusion. The steppe is fragile. This isn’t fantasy; it’s response.

别一言以蔽之说是‘漂绿’。打散建筑体量确实是合理的生态策略——能减少占地、让风和野生动物自由穿过,降低视觉侵扰。草原生态很脆弱。这不是幻想,而是回应。

Sarcastic Civil Engineer (毒舌土木工程师)
Ah yes, ‘reduce visual intrusion’—by spending $40 million helicoptering in materials so we don’t have to look at buildings. Peak irony.

啊对,‘降低视觉侵扰’——靠花四千万美元用直升机空运建材,就为了让我们看不见建筑。讽刺拉满。

NOT A HOTEL Guest 2024 (NOT A HOTEL 2024住客)
I stayed there. It’s not about the brand. It’s about the silence, the light, the way the space makes you slow down. You can feel the thought in every curve. Call it branding, but it works.

我住过。这跟品牌无关。而是关于寂静、光线,以及空间如何让你慢下来。每个曲线都透着用心。你可以叫它品牌营销,但它确实‘奏效’了。

Postmodernism Enthusiast (后现代主义爱好者)
Funny how we romanticize ZHA’s organic forms while dismissing Boill’s raw concrete at La Fábrica as ‘oppressive.’ One’s ‘flowing nature,’ the other’s ‘brutal.’ Newsflash: both are constructs. Both are authored. Our emotional response is the real architecture.

有趣,我们赞美扎哈的有机形态,却说博菲尔在‘工厂’用的粗野混凝土‘压抑’。一个叫‘流动的自然’,一个叫‘粗暴’。醒醒吧:都是人为构建。都有作者意图。真正起作用的是我们的情感反应。

Local Herder from Xinjiang (新疆当地牧民)
They built it near our summer pasture. No one asked us. Now tourists come, scare the sheep, and leave trash. ‘Harmony with nature’? Don’t make me laugh.

他们在我们夏季牧场边上建的。没人问过我们。现在游客来了,吓跑羊群,还留下垃圾。‘与自然和谐’?别逗我笑了。

Landscape Philosopher (景观哲学家)
The moment architecture declares ‘I am nature,’ it denies nature’s autonomy. True respect isn’t mimicry—it’s restraint.

当建筑宣称‘我就是自然’时,它就否定了自然的自主性。真正的尊重不是模仿,而是克制。

ZHA Devotee (扎哈死忠粉)
Yes, it’s curated. Yes, it’s expensive. But to experience a Zaha Hadid space in motion, in light, in silence—that’s transcendent. Not everything has to be ‘of the people’ to be meaningful.

是的,很精心策划。是的,很贵。但在光影与寂静中体验扎哈·哈迪德的空间流动——那是超越性的。不是所有有意义的东西都必须‘属于人民’。

Reddit Moderator Who Hates Hot Takes (讨厌极端言论的Reddit版主)
Cool project, cool discussion. But can we drop the ‘either genius or fraud’ framing? It’s architecture. It’s complicated. Let people like what they like.

项目不错,讨论也精彩。但我们能别动不动就说‘不是天才就是骗子’吗?这是建筑,很复杂。让人喜欢他们喜欢的吧。