Trump Tried to Kill Artemis 4 — Then a Senator Dropped a 'Big, Beautiful Bill' to Save It. What’s Next for NASA & ESA?

特朗普曾要砍掉阿尔忒弥斯4号任务，结果一位参议员甩出一张“美丽大法案”救了它——NASA和欧空局接下来怎么办？

www.space.com

So let's get this straight: the Trump administration nearly axed the entire post-Artemis 3 plan, including cancelling Orion, SLS, and even the Lunar Gateway — all to be replaced by 'commercial alternatives' that don’t exist yet. And not just that, they proposed the smallest NASA budget since 1961. Was this 'disruption' or just plain sabotage?

我们来理清一下：特朗普政府几乎砍掉了阿尔忒弥斯3号之后的所有计划，包括取消猎户座飞船、太空发射系统（SLS），甚至月球门户站——全都要换成‘商业替代方案’，可这些方案根本还没影儿呢。更别提了，他们还提出了自1961年以来最小的NASA预算。这究竟是‘颠覆性改革’，还是赤裸裸的破坏？

But then—BAM—a mysterious 'Big, Beautiful Bill' appears, backed by Ted Cruz, restoring billions in funding. Suddenly, ESA’s €650M service module for Artemis 4 is relevant again. Honestly, is space policy now just a game of political whack-a-mole?

但接着——砰——一张神秘的‘美丽大法案’出现了，由特德·克鲁兹背书，恢复了数百亿资金。突然之间，欧空局那6.5亿欧元的阿尔忒弥斯4号服务舱又变得重要了。说真的，现在的航天政策难道只是场政治打地鼠游戏吗？

Texas Rocket Dad (德州火箭奶爸)

Ted Cruz saved the Gateway? Never thought I'd see the day. This is why having space interests in Congress matters. Texas has jobs tied to SLS — this wasn’t charity, it was economic defense.

特德·克鲁兹救了门户站？我从没想过会有这一天。这就是为什么国会里有航天利益代表如此重要。德克萨斯州的SLS项目绑着大量工作机会——这不是做慈善，是经济自卫。

Orbital Cynic (轨道愤青)

Oh wow, so now we’re building a $41.1 billion rocket to orbit the Moon so politicians can say they ‘saved’ something they almost killed? Peak space bureaucracy.

哇哦，所以我们现在要花411亿美元造一枚火箭绕月飞行，就为了让政客们能说自己‘拯救’了他们差点弄死的项目？太空官僚主义的巅峰了。

EuroSpace Advocate (欧洲航天拥护者)

Let’s not forget: ESA’s investment in these modules isn’t just about barter. It’s about securing Europe’s seat at the table for deep space exploration. We’re not just hauling batteries—we’re building legacy.

别忘了：欧空局对这些模块的投入不仅仅是易货交易。这是为了确保欧洲在深空探索桌上有一席之地。我们不只是在运送电池——我们是在建立传承。

Green Energy Skeptic (绿色能源怀疑论者)

Meanwhile, Earth is burning, and we’re arguing over moon hotels. NASA’s budget should be focused on climate observation, not lunar joyrides.

与此同时，地球都在燃烧了，我们却还在争什么月球酒店。NASA的预算应该投向气候观测，而不是月球观光。

NASA Intern 2028 (2028届NASA实习生)

Artemis 4 lands in 2028, I-4 launches in 2030, Mars in 2035... if funding lasts. We’re not building rockets. We’re building hope with duct tape and hope.

阿尔忒弥斯4号2028年发射，I-4望远镜2030年升空，2035年登陆火星……前提是资金不断。我们造的不是火箭，是用胶带和希望拼出来的梦想。

Orbital Cynic (轨道愤青)

‘Building hope’? Sure. And I’m building a Dyson sphere in my garage.

‘建造希望’？说得挺好。那我也正在车库里造戴森球呢。

Lunar Geologist PhD (月球地质学博士)

Before you all dunk on lunar missions: the science from the Gateway will help us understand planetary formation, radiation shielding, and long-term survivability in deep space. This isn’t vanity — it’s preparation.

在你们猛喷登月任务之前：门户站的科学数据将帮助我们理解行星形成、辐射防护和深空长期生存能力。这可不是虚荣，而是准备。

Houston Techie (休斯顿科技狗)

Fun fact: ESA’s service module uses solar wings that span 62 feet. That’s more efficient than SLS’s entire power budget. Sometimes, quiet collaboration beats American loud budgeting.

冷知识：欧空局的服务舱太阳能翼展开达62英尺，比SLS的整个电力预算还高效。有时候，安静的合作胜过美国式的烧钱狂欢。

Trump Tried to Kill Artemis 4 — Then a Senator Dropped a 'Big, Beautiful Bill' to Save It. What’s Next for NASA & ESA?

特朗普曾要砍掉阿尔忒弥斯4号任务，结果一位参议员甩出一张“美丽大法案”救了它——NASA和欧空局接下来怎么办？

一部‘宏伟美丽的法案’真的拯救了登月计划？政治如何决定了阿尔忒弥斯4号的命运

阿耳忒弥斯2号是真正的登月回归，还是又一场华丽的试飞秀？